|
| НА ГОЛОВНУ | |
№ 2021/4
1ДУ «Інститут економіки та прогнозування НАН України»
CORPORATE INCOME TAX GAP ESTIMATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DEVELOPMENT OF FISCAL SPACE
| Economy and forecasting 2021; 4:107-120 | https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2021.04.107 |
АНОТАЦІЯ ▼
The article is devoted to the analysis of the corporate income tax gap as one of the indicators that characterizes the tax revenues that a country can accumulate accounting for its economic potential. The author summarizes the main theoretical views on the causes of the tax gap and investigates existing methodological approaches to assess the tax gap on corporate income tax in OECD countries.
The article estimates the income tax gap under the OECD Revenue Administration - Gap Analysis Program, which is based on determining potential tax revenues by adjusting the aggregate indicators of the system of national accounts (gross output, mixed income), which, according to the analysis, averaged at 1.4% GDP in the period 2017-2019, which shows a potential for the development of the fiscal space of Ukraine. Upon analysis of the distribution of the tax gap between institutional sectors of the economy, the largest gap in corporate income tax was found in the sector of foreign corporations whose potential tax revenues were estimated as tripled relative to the declared tax revenues accrued in the Consolidated Budget of Ukraine in 2018.
The author conducted a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of corporate income tax in Ukraine on the basis of tax efforts and budget efficiency ratios, which revealed significant weaknesses in comparison with similar indicators in other countries.
The main measures aimed at eliminating tax gaps in OECD countries are summed up and recommendations are made for Ukraine.
Ключові слова:tax gap, corporate income tax, fiscal space, tax effort, budget efficiency
| Стаття англійською мовою (cтор. 107 - 120) | Завантажити | Завантажень : 31 |
СПИСОК ЛІТЕРАТУРИ ▼
2. The concept of tax gaps – Corporate Income Tax Gap Estimation Methodologies. Taxation Papers / Tax Gap Project Group, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission. 2018. No. 73. 112 p. URL: ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/taxation_papers_73_en.pdf
3. Jansen A., Ngobeni W., Sithole A., Steyn W. The corporate income tax gap in South Africa: A top-down approach. WIDER Working Paper Series / World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER). 2020. Wp-2020-40. 17 p. URL: www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/Publications/Working-paper/PDF/wp2020-40.pdf; doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2020/797-2
4. Khwaja Munawer Sultan and Iyer Indira. Revenue Potential, Tax Space, and Tax Gap: A Comparative Analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. May 1, 2014. No. 6868. 39 p. URL: documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/733431468038088702/pdf/WPS6868.pdf; doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6868
5. The Development of the Tax Gap in Sweden 2007-12. Report 2014 / Swedish Tax Agency. URL: www.skatteverket.se/download/18.15532c7b1442f256baeae28/1395223863657/The+developm ent+of+the+tax+gap+in+Sweden+2007-12.pdf
6. Ueda Unji. Estimating the Corporate Income Tax Gap. The RA-GAP Methodology, IMF Technical Notes and Manuals 2018/002 / International Monetary Fund. 36 p. URL: ttp://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=45890; doi.org/10.5089/9781484357224.005
7. Gallucci M., Pansini R.V., Pisani D. Direct taxes gap estimates: methodology and preliminary results. Discussion topics. Agenzia delle Entrate. № 02/2020. 23 р. URL: www.researchgate.net/publication/342814858_DIRECT_TAXES_GAP_ESTIMATES_METHODOLOGY_AND_PRELIMINARY_RESULTS#fullTextFileContent
8. Costa Rica: Technical Assistance Report-Revenue Administration Gap Analysis Program-Tax Gap Analysis for General Sales and Corporate Income Tax, Technical Assistance Report / IMF. 2018. 70 p. URL: www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2018/05/29/Costa-Rica-Technical-Assistance-Report-Revenue-Administration-Gap-Analysis-Program-Tax-Gap-45891
9. Spillovers in International Corporate Taxation. IMF Policy Paper / International Monetary Fund. 2014. Washington DC.: International Monetary Fund. 86 р. URL: www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2014/050914.pdf
10. Order of the State Statistics Service "Methodological Regulations on the Organization of the State Statistical Survey "Annual National Accounts" of July 9, 2020 № 204. Retrieved from ukrstat.gov.ua/norm_doc/2020/204/204.pdf
11. Tax gap and compliance results for the Federal corporate income tax system. Canada Revenue Agency Report. 2019. 46 p. URL: www.canada.ca/content/dam/cra-arc/corp-info/aboutcra/tax-gap/txgp2019-en.pdf
12. Guenther G. Federal Tax Gap: Size, Contributing Factors, and the Debate Over Reducing August 2, 2021. It. IF11887. URL: crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11887
13. Marr Chuck, Washington Sam, Jacoby Samantha, Reich David. Rebuilding IRS Would Reduce Tax Gap, Help Replenish Depleted Revenue Base / Centre on Budget and Policy Priopities. 2021. 10 p. URL: www.taxnotes.com/featured-analysis/shrinking-tax-gap-comprehensive-approach/2020/11/25/2d7ht
Календар подій
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
