Увійти 
|
HOME PAGE | |
№ 2019/4
OLEFIR Volodymyr Kostiantynovych1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
EXPERIENCE OF THE FORMATION OF FREE TRADE AREAS WITH CHINA
Economy and forecasting 2019; 4:129-148 | https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2019.04.129 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The experience of the formation of free trade areas (FTA) of China with
the countries of Asia, Oceania, Europe and South America is investigated.
The dynamics of bilateral trade, as well as changes in the product structure
after the entry into force of the FTA agreement, is analyzed. Summarized the
positive effects and negative consequences of the functioning of the FTA with China for the countries of Asia, Oceania, Europe and South America. A forecast is made of possible positive effects and negative consequences for
the domestic economy from the liberalization of trade relations with China.
In particular, as of August 2019, China had existing bilateral FTA agreements with 20 countries, and the preparatory process continued with at least 20 countries. The purpose of the article was to analyze the effectiveness of the functioning of the FTA with China for its trading partners, in particular, Chile, Peru, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar, Pakistan, New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland, Iceland. For the
study, data were used for 1999-2017.
Since during 1999-2017 China's economy developed rapidly, all countries
that were investigated increased their exports to China. Six out of eleven
countries after the entry into force of the free trade agreements increased
their exports to China more than in the same period before the agreement.
China, after the entry into force of free trade agreements, increased exports
to 8 of its 11 foreign trade partners.
After the conclusion of the FTA Agreement, the export structure of bilateral trade has become more diversified for both China and its foreign trade partners. This is evidenced by the dynamics of such indicators as a share in the export of 6 major product groups; the number of product groups, export volumes of which were zero, but became not zero; the number of product groups, export volumes of which exceeded $ 1 million, that is, they became significant.
According to the criterion of trade balance, China after liberalization
received more benefits than its trading partners. In particular, the balance
of bilateral trade with the PRC was improved by 4 countries, while for 7
countries, after the entry into force of the FTA agreement, it worsened.
In November 2018, an agreement was reached between the Ukrainian
and Chinese parties on joint consultations regarding the prerequisites for the establishment of an FTA. In the Export Strategy of Ukraine for 2017-2021 is noted that "... the initiation of new free trade agreements should be based solely on the basis of studies of economic feasibility ...".
Keywords:People's Republic of China, free trade agreement, liberalization efficiency, export promotion, import's dependence
JEL: F13, F14
Article in English (pp. 129 - 148) | Download | Downloads :335 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 129 - 148) |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Bohdan, T.P. (2018). Free trade area between Ukraine and the EU: new rules, risks and opportunities. Finansy Ukrainy – Finance of Ukraine, 10, 7- 27 [in Ukrainian].
3. Reinert, Erik S. (2015). How rich countries got rich … and why poor countries stay poor. Kyiv: Tempora [in Ukrainian].
4. Sidenko, V.R. (2017). New US trade policy: global intermission. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 5-6, 58-66 [in Ukrainian].
5. Studwell, J. (2013). How Asia works: Success and Failure in the World's Most Dynamic Region. London: Grove Press.
6. Benefits and Costs of DCFTA: Evaluation of the Impact on Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Retrieved from wiiw.ac.at/benefits-and-costs-of-dcfta-evaluation-of-the-
impact-on-georgia-moldova-and-ukraine-dlp-4111.pdf
7. Macroeconomic Consequences of Tariffs. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publi-
cations/WP/Issues/2019/01/15/Macroeconomic-Consequences-of-Tariffs-46469
8. Trade Liberalization and Economic Reform in Developing Countries: structural change or De-industrialization? Retrieved from unctad.org/en/docs/osgdp20053_en.pdf
9. Chile. Retrieved from oec.world/en/profile/country/chl/
10. UN Comtrade: International trade statistics. Retrieved from comtrade.un.org/data/
11. The Protocol Upgrading China-Chile Free Trade Agreement Comes into Force Today.
Retrieved from fta.mofcom.gov.cn/enarticle/chiletwoen/chiletwoennews/201903/39928_1.html
12. Peru. Retrieved from oec.world/en/profile/country/per/
13. The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Retrieved from www3.wefo-
rum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
14. Malaysia. Retrieved from oec.world/en/profile/country/mys/
15. Philippines. Retrieved from oec.world/en/profile/country/phl/
16. Monthly export statistics (2019, May). Retrieved from www.ico.org/prices/m1-ex-
ports.pdf
17. Vietnam. Retrieved from oec.world/en/profile/country/vnm/
18. Burma. Retrieved from oec.world/en/profile/country/mmr/
19. Economy of Pakistan. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Economy_of_Pakistan
20. Pakistan. Retrieved from oec.world/en/profile/country/pak/
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |