|
| HOME PAGE | |
№ 2020/3
NEBRAT Victoria Vasylivna 1, GORDITSA Karolina Adolfivna2, GORIN Nazar Olegovych3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2State Institution "Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine"
3"Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine"
Structural and financial risks of land capitalization: lessons of domestic history
| Economy and forecasting 2020; 3:63-81 | https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2020.03.063 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article is devoted to the problem of the relationship between expected results and real institutional, structural, and financial consequences of agrarian reforms aimed at the capitalization of land. The purpose of the publication is to summarize the positive and negative experience of the peasant reform of 1861 on changes in the relations of ownership and land use in the budgetary and financial sphere and foreign economic activity. Research is based on the history-institutional methodology using tools of economic comparability, retrospective analysis, and historical reconstruction.
It is defined that the opening of the land market and the creation of a system of mortgage land loans allowed to increase the share of private land ownership of peasants, but did not turn them into effective owners and did not solve the problem of peasant land. Rising land prices contributed to the development of land speculation and increased rents, encouraging the farmers to predatory land use and depletion of soils without increasing productivity.
The capitalization of land and the expansion of the hired labor market contributed to economic growth, increased government revenues and expenditures, and overcame the chronic state budget deficit. At the same time, the credit indebtedness of peasants grew, while ransom payments depleted peasant farms, reducing the potential for capital formation and investment.
The public policy of forcing grain exports and supporting large agribusiness allowed to replenish the gold reserves of the treasury, but also led to the impoverishment of farmers, reduced quality of the exported grain, increased share of fodder crops, and lower share of food crops and finished goods. Intensified international competition to expand the supply of cheap grain led to lower prices, weaker competitive position of domestic exporters, and the growing dependence of the economy on world markets for agricultural products, and the local agrarian business - on foreign capital.
The article provides recommendations to the government about taking into account the historical experience in the implementation of modern agrarian transformations, in particular, comprehensive support for farming as the main link of agricultural production and the guarantor of food security of the country. Their implementation will help prevent the risks of over-concentration of land, the proletarianization of the peasantry and its mass migration to cities and abroad, growing environmental problems, and vulnerability of the economy due to increasing dependence on the world markets for agricultural raw materials.
Keywords:agrarian reform, land capitalization, land ownership, peasant bank, financial support of the reform, the productivity of agricultural production, the export of agricultural products
JEL: N53, Q15, Q17, Q18
| Article in English (pp. 63 - 81) | Download | Downloads :276 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Liashchenko, P.Y. (1908). Essays on Agrarian Evolution in Russia. Vol. 1. Saint-Petersburg [in Russian].
3. Liashchenko, P.Y. (1915). Grain farming and grain trading relations between Russia and Germany in connection with customs tax. Petrograd [in Russian].
4. Teplytskyi, V.P. (1959). Reform of 1861 and agrarian relations in Ukraine (60-90s of the XIX cent.). Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Institute of Economics. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
5. Ciaian, P., Kancs, D., Swinnen, J., Van Herck, K., Vranken, l. (2012, February). Sales Market Regulations for Agricultural Land in the EU Member States and Candidate Countries. Factor Markets: working paper, 14. Retrieved from aei.pitt.edu/58517/1/Factor_Markets_14.pdf
6. Hartvigsen, M. (2013). Land reform in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989 and its outcome in the form of farm structures and land fragmentation. FAO Land Tenure Working Paper, 24. Retrieved from www.fao.org/3/a-aq097e.pdf
7. Swinnen, J., Buckwell, A., Mathijs, E. (1997). Agricultural Privatisation, Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge. Retrieved from www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/ 9780429450228
8. Heyets, V.M., Borodina O.M., Prokopa I.V. (Eds.). (2012). Ukrainian model of agricultural development and its socio-economic reorientation. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for economics and forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Borodina, O.M., Shubravska, O.V. (Eds.). (2018). Agrarian and rural development for the growth and renewal of the Ukrainian economy. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for economics and forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
10. Krupin, V. (2016). Restructuring of the rural economy in Ukraine: undergoing processes and new directions. Wieś i Rolnictwo, 4, 65-80. Retrieved from www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=525045
11. Borodina, O., Krupin, V. (2017). Is it Possible to Utilise the Agricultural Potential of Ukraine under the Current Agrarian System? Eurochoices. 17 (1), 46-51. Retrieved from onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1111/1746-692X.12151
12. Yaremenko, O.L. (2018). Controversial influence of institutional reforms on the functioning of the economy. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 11-12, 3-18. doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2018.11.003 [in Ukrainian].
13. Semenov, D.P. (1904). Statistical essay of peasant land tenure and land use in European Russia. Saint-Petersburg: Typografyya MVD [in Russian].
14. Tugan-Baranovsky, M.I. (1906). Nationalization of the land. An outline of the movement in favor of land nationalization and practical gains. sec. ed. Saint-Petersburg: Typ. Skorokhodova [in Russian].
15. Sviatlovskyi, V.V. (1911). Mobilization of land ownership in Russia (1861-1908). Saint-Petersburg [in Russian].
16. Nebrat, V.V. (2020). Ukrainian sources of spatial justice theory. Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni – History of economics and economic thought of Ukraine, 53, 9-33. doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2020.53.009 [in Ukrainian].
17. Khuan, Ya. (2012). Capitalism in Chinese: Government and Business. 2-nd ed. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher [in Russian].
18. Didkivska, L.V. (2019). Migration of Ukrainians at the pre-industrial stage of social development. Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni – History of economics and economic thought of Ukraine, 52, 138-154. doi.org/10.15407/ ingedu2019.52.138 [in Ukrainian].
19. Kovanko, P. (1914). Reform of February 19, 1861 and its consequences from a financial point of view (Purchase operation 1861-1907). Kiev: Typ. imper. univ-ta Sv. Vladymyra [in Russian].
20. Nebrat, V.V. (Ed.). (2019). Entrepreneurship in Ukraine: historical and institutional analysis. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for economics and forecasting. Kyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/314.pdf
21. Reyent, O.P., Serdyuk, O.V. (2011). Agriculture of Ukraine and the world food market (1861-1914). NAS of Ukraine, Institute of history of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
22. Nyfontov, A.S. (1974). Grain production in Russia in the second half of the nineteenth century. Based on the materials of the annual statistics of harvests in European Russia. Moscow: \"Nauka\" [in Russian].
23. Kondratiev, N.D. (1991). The grain market and its regulation during the war and revolution. Moscow: \"Nauka\" [in Russian].
24. Shults, A.K. (1913). Research on the production and trade of German field products for 30 years in connection with the Russian-German trade agreement. Materials for the revision of the trade agreement with Germany. Saint-Petersburg: Typ. Ministerstva finansov [in Russian].
25. Korablin, S.O. (2017). Macroeconomic dynamics of Ukraine: a trap of raw materials markets. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for economics and forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
26. Gorno-zavodskoe delo – Mining business (1912). 51/52, 6461–6462.
27. Pustovoit, O.V. (2016). Ukrainian economy: chaotic and cyclical fluctuations around the long-term growth trend. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 2, 86-109.
doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.02.083 [in Ukrainian].
28. Hordunovskyi, O.M., Hurzhii, O.I., Reient, O.P. (2017). Trade in Southern Ukraine: organization of trade and human potential (end of XVIII – beginning of XX century). NAS of Ukraine, Institute of history of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Events calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
