|
| HOME PAGE | |
№ 2019/1
PODOLETS Roman 1, YUKHYMETS Roman Serhiyovych2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Alternative options of the introduction of the «entry-exit» transport tariff model in Ukraine
| Economy and forecasting 2019; 1:83-104 | https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2019.01.083 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Compliance to the principles of free access to gas networks on a market basis, objectivity reflection of the system's cost, transparency and predictability of market participants requires changes to the tariff setting rules for transportation services. The introduction of the "entry-exit" tariff model is intended to ensure the achievement of new market requirements and the establishment of common European rules for conducting economic activities. Changing the internal model of gas transportation also results in a change in the pricing principles for services provided by the TSO. Henceforth, the charge for transportation services should be taken not for the transport distance, but for the capacity of the entrance and exit points which should be sold publicly and independently. It allows for a more objective consideration of the operating costs of servicing the system and providing greater commercial variability in ordering system services by business entities.
However, European legislation does not define a single standard for the "entry-exit" model. Depending on the technical features of the network and the priorities of the national policy, each country determines the best option for itself. In this paper we used a set of mathematical models to evaluate the implications of the introduction of three alternative variants of the tariff model in two variants of workload GTS (optimistic and pessimistic scenarios): full "entry-exit" model, two market zones, and "entry-exit" model with a long-term reservation. The results of the calculations were compared with the baseline scenario, which does not involve a change in the market model and gas transit is carried out in accordance with the terms of long-term contracts of 2009.
In general, changing the model for providing transport services in the gas market should lead to fundamental institutional transformations of contractual relations between all market actors and the principles of market functioning.
Keywords: natural gas market, transport operator, «entry-exit» model, long-term transit contracts
JEL: L95
| Article in English (pp. 83 - 104) | Download | Downloads :467 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. International Energy Outlook 2016. Retrieved from www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/nat_gas.cfm
3. Third Energy Package. Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from www2.nationalgrid.com/UK/Industry-information/Europe/Third-energy-package/
4. Supply Stats. Gazprom. Retrieved from www.gazpromexport.ru/statistics/
5. International Energy Outlook 2016. Retrieved from www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/nat_gas.cfm
6. EU Reference Scenario 2016 Energy, Transport and GHG Emissions Trends to 2050. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/ref2016_report_final-web.pdf
7. Linchevskyi M.P., Lutsyk O.E., Linchevska N.M. (2012) Analysis of the methods used in the calculation of tariffs for transit and transportation of gas in the EU and Ukraine. Naukovyi visnyk IFNTUNH - Scientific journal IFNTUNH, 2(32), 10-17 [in Ukrainian].
8. Presentation of Ukrtransgaz Code of the gas transmission system. Principles of interaction with GDS operator. Retrieved from www.google.com.ua/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwisz5y0i9vUAhXrJJoKHcEdAMEQFgglMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Futg.ua%2Fimg%2Fmenu%2Fbusinessinfo%2Fprinciples%2FDSO%2FCode-netw-DSO.pptx&usg=AFQjCNE13vIQvV2TmmCvXMVo5kfpa6XezQ
9. Typical transportation contract. Retrieved from www.nerc.gov.ua/index.php?id=18033
10. Pavlova S.I., Yukhymchuk I.O. (2010). RAB-Regulation of tariffs as a method of increasing the investment attractiveness of energy companies. Visnyk ZhDTU – Journal ZhDTU, 3(53), 278-281 [in Ukrainian].
11. Reporting of Ukrtransgaz. Retrieved from utg.ua/utg/about-company/reports.html [in Ukrainian].
12. Reporting of Naftogaz of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.naftogaz.com/www/3/nakweb.nsf/0/9B0566E71C6B0F9CC2257EDD006E558B?OpenDocument&Expand=2& [in Ukrainian].
13. National Commission for State Regulation of Energy and Public Utilities Regulation No. 389 dated March 24, 2016 'On Approval of the Plan for the Development of the Gas Transportation System of PJSC Ukrtransgaz for 2016-2025'. Retrieved from h8.nerc.gov.ua/?id=19543 [in Ukrainian].
14. Macroprovision of the development of the Ukrainian economy in 2018-2021. Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/?p=6317 [in Ukrainian].
15. National Commission for State Regulation of Energy and Public Utilities Regulation No. 899 at 11.07.2013. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy – Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 60, 238 [in Ukrainian].
16. Yukhymets R.S. (2017). On some peculiar features in the introduction of the 'entry-exit' tariff model on Ukrainian natural gas market. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 128-145. doi: doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.01.128 [in Ukrainian].
17. Government portal. Energy security and transit stability in the EU require transparent rules. Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/control/publish/article?art_id=247520638
18. Energy charter: Transit Protocol. Retrieved from www.energycharter.org/what-we-do/trade-and-transit/transit-protocol/
19. Artus, M.M. (2002). Formation of the mechanism of pricing in a market economy. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].
20. Vitrenko, Yu.Iu. (2008). Economic justification for calculating the gas transit rate and the cost of imported gas. Dzerkalo tyzhnia – Weekly mirror, 2, 15-16 [in Ukrainian].
21. Podolets R.Z., Diachuk O.A., Chepeliev M.H. (2015). Integrated Approach to Modeling the Development of the Ukrainian Energy System. Visnyk Instytutu ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia – Journal of the Institute for Economics and Forecasting, 50-59 [in Ukrainian].
22. Chepeliev M.H. (2015). Modeling and estimating the economic consequences of subsidizing household consumers of energy resources: theses candidate's degree in economics: 08.00.11. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
23. Chepeliev M.H. (2014). Modelling and assessment of economic effects of subsidy policy change in Ukrainian natural gas market. Ekonomika promyslovosti – Economy of the industry, 3, 25-42 [in Ukrainian].
24. Chepeliev M.H. (2014). Simulation and evaluation of the economic impact of the change of the tariff policy on Ukrainian electricity market. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 121-138 [in Ukrainian].
25. Trinh, B., Phong N.V. (2013). A Short Note on RAS Method Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 3, 133-137.
26. Chepeliev M.H., Yukhymets R.S. (2017). The assessment is, in fact, the introduction of the 'input-output' tariff system into the natural gas market of Ukraine. Zbirnyk tez dopovidei Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii 'Problemy staloho rozvytku ekonomiky v umovakh posylennia hlobalizatsiinykh protsesiv' – Collection of abstracts of the International scientific and practical conference 'Problems of sustainable economic development in the conditions of strengthening of globalization processes', 9-13 [in Ukrainian].
Events calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
