Увійти 
|
HOME PAGE | |
№ 2020/1
SHUBRAVSKA Olena Vasylivna1, PROKOPENKO Kateryna Oleksiivna 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The influence of Ukrainian agricultural corporations on the national trade balance
Economy and forecasting 2020; 1:97-111 | https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2020.01.097 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Determined the role of the agricultural corporate sector in the formation of export flows, identified the fundamental trends of agro-food foreign trade, assessed the competitiveness of main agro-food commodity groups and defined, on this basis, the promising guidelines for its expansion via increased share of exports of the most competitive products. The methodological basis of the research is the system of general and special scientific methods. Empirical results, concerning the role of the agrarian corporate sector, have been obtained through retrospective analysis, grouping, benchmarking and generalization. The research of commodity structure and foreign trade flows of agrarian sector was based on economic and statistical methods, in particular the balance method, the determination of the geometrical mean of annual growth rate and so on. The method of assessing the competitiveness of each product group through the Lafay Index, which shows the difference between the normalized trade balance for individual goods and for all goods traded by the country, was used for identifying the comparative advantages of Ukraine in international agro-food trade. The calculations were carried out using world and national statistics. Time series cover the period 2004-2018 and are analyzed from the standpoint of commodity structure. It is determined that that the corporate sector in Ukrainian agriculture is the main producer of export flows of agro-food products. The commodity structure research showed negative changes in value added. The share of unprocessed goods in trade increases due to a decrease in the share of processed products, which allows us to state the raw material orientation of Ukrainian agro-food exports. It was noted that attention should be focused on increasing the share of products with higher value added in agro-food exports. The prospects for increasing exports of organic products were outlined. The comparative advantages of Ukraine in relation to the global economy were analyzed based on the Lafay Index calculation. Received estimates allowed dividing the export commodity structure into competitive and non-competitive products. Products with a high level of competitiveness were identified based on the Lafay Index analysis as well as based on the corresponding balance sheets. The mono-specialization of agro-food exports, which makes itself felt in the predominance of raw materials, has become even stronger due to the orientation of the corporate sector solely to the global food demand and the weakness of the influence of state management structures in Ukraine. This causes instable export earnings and poor predictability of the results of Ukrainian farmers' economic activities, as well as increases significantly the environmental risks of agricultural production. The Ukrainian agro-food foreign trade is characterized by positive features, including an increase in value and volume of exports, improved food self-sufficiency, surplus trade accretion and by negative ones, namely: reduction of the share of processed products and semi-finished products in the agrarian trade structure, low activity of small agricultural traders oriented to exportation products from Ukraine, and weak promotion of Ukrainian agro-food exports by public authorities.
Keywords:agro-food foreign trade, corporate agrarian sector, competitiveness, commodity structure, export flows
JEL: Q13, Q17
Article in English (pp. 97 - 111) | Download | Downloads :393 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Pugachov, M.I. (2019). Development of foreign trade of agro-food products. Ekonomika APK – Economics of AIC, 3, 6-12. doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201903006 [in Ukrainian].
3. Seheda, S.A. (2019). Agro-food products in commodity structure of the foreign trade of Ukraine. Ekonomika APK – Economics of AIC, 2, 73-83. doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201902073 [in Ukrainian].
4. Sychevskyi, M.P. (2019). Global food security and Ukraine's place in its achievement. Ekonomika APK – Economics of AIC, 1, 6-17. doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055. 201901006 [in Ukrainian].
5. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
6. Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure. International trade in goods (ext_go_agg). Eurostat. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/ metadata/en/ext_go_agg_esms.htm#unit_measure1537195068659
7. Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., Samuelson, P. (1977). Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods. American Economic Review, 67, 823-839.
8. Lafay, G. (1992). The measurement of revealed comparative advantages. In: Dagenais M.G., Muet P.A. (eds). International Trade Modeling (p. 209-234). Chapman & Hill, London. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2150-8_10 9. Vollrath, T. (1991). A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, 265-279. doi.org/10.1007/BF02707986.
10. Pretty, J. (2008). Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Lond B Biol Sci, 363(1491), 447-465. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
11. World Investment Report 2009. (2009). Transnational Corporations, Agricultural Production and Development. UNCTAD. Retrieved from unctad.org/en/docs/wir2009_en.pdf
12. Zinchuk, T.O., Nykoliuk, O.M., Pyvovar, P.V. (2019). Features of functioning of vertically integrated business structures of holding type in the agrarian sector. Ekonomika APK – Economics of AIC, 9, 19-29. doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201909019 [in Ukrainian].
13. Ackoff, R.L. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or be Planned for. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
14. TOP 10 Agroholdings in Ukraine. (2018). Ministerie van landbouw, natuur en voedselkwaliteit. Retrieved from www.agroberichtenbuitenland.nl/documenten/ publicaties/2018/07/12/top-10-agroholdings-in-ukraine
15. Named the leaders of agricultural exports from Ukraine (2019). AgroPortal.ua. Retrieved from agroportal.ua/news/novosti-kompanii/nazvany-lidery-eksporta-agroproduktsii-iz-ukrainy/ [in Russian].
16. Shubravska, O., Prokopenko, K. (2014). Ukraine's integration perspectives: advantages and risks for the agrarian sector. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 63-73 [in Ukrainian].
17. Willer, H., Lernoud, J. (2019). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2019. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, and IFOAM - Organics International. Bonn.
18. A booming organic sector: 57.8 million hectares of organic agricultural land - the organic market grows to almost 90 billion US Dollars (2018). IFOAM. Retrieved from www.ifoam.bio/en/news/2018/02/14/booming-organic-sector-578-million-hectares-organic-agricultural-land-organic-market
19. Shubravska, O.V. (2017). Organic agriculture in Ukraine. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 2, 116-128. doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.02.116 [in Ukrainian].
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |