|
| HOME PAGE | |
№ 2020/3
BLYZNIUK Viktoriia Valeriyivna1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Institutional support of the inclusiveness of Ukrainian labor market
| Economy and forecasting 2020; 3:47-62 | https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2020.03.047 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The author substantiates a toolkit for ensuring the inclusiveness of the labor market. When considering the set of institutional entities, which, in the course of reconciliation of their own interests on the labor market contribute to its development and institutionalization, she proves that violation of their interaction causes a distortion of the institutional structure of labor market, throws the system out of balance and leads to risks and threats to labor application and the socio-economic sphere as a whole. Since there are no reference institutions in their pure form, the contradictory combination of functions, norms and logic determines the functioning of hybrids of inclusive and extractive institutions. Thus, the labor market can be considered as a conglomeration of institutions with a set of inclusive and extractive features.
The study found that the systemic problems of the labor market are institutional problems, such as imperfections and inconsistencies in the rules for implementing various components of economic policy (monetary, budgetary, tax, debt, employment ones and others). The scenario of riding out the crisis is also based on the introduction of the following institutional measures: adoption of legislative decisions and norms that shape an institutional field for minimizing the extractive features of the institutional structure and the formation of an inclusive labor market.
The author substantiates various guidelines for ensuring the inclusiveness of the labor market development in the form of a theoretical construct, which defines the factors of influence, and specifies the tools and mechanisms for introducing innovative methods of state regulation in the field of employment.
Keywords:labor market inclusiveness, institutional entities, extractive, inclusive institutions, inclusive and extractive features, institutional structure of the labor market
JEL: J21, J38
| Article in English (pp. 47 - 62) | Download | Downloads :358 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Egorshin, A.P. (2008). Labor resource management methodology. Nizhniy Novgorod [in Russian].
3. Volianska-Savchuk, L., Krasovskyi, V. (2019). Theoretical principles of the labor market in the economic system. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia – Economics and organization of management, (1(33)). 21-32. dx.doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2019.1.3 [in Ukrainian].
4. Panyuk, T. (2010). Characteristics of the labor market in modern conditions. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Relevant problems of economics, 6 (108), 204-208 [in Ukrainian].
5. Labour market policies and institutions (an electronic resource). Areas of work. The International Labour Organization. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/empelm/areas/labour-market-policies-and-institutions/lang--en/index.htm
6. Freeman, R.B. Labour market institutions. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2686-1
7. Toffler, E. (2010). The third wave. Moskow: AST [in Russian].
8. Mauskapf, M., Zajac, E. The Emergence and Persistence of Institutional Dissonance at the New York Phil harmonic, 1842-1928. doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013. 12015abstract
9. Frolov, D. From institutions to extitutions to the post-institutional theory of institutional anomalies. Retrieved from mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/95960/MPRAPaperNo.95960
10. Polishchuk, L. (2008). Misuse of Institutions: Causes and Consequences. Voprosy ekonomiki – Issues of economics, (8), 28-44. doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-8-28-44 [in Russian]
11. Menaldo, V. (2016). The Institutions Curse: Natural Resources, Politics, and Development. Cambridge University Press, New York. Crossref DOI link: doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2016.1213675
12. Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2015).Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Moscow: AST [in Russian].
13. Balatsky, E.V. (2017). The concept of inclusive institutions and its applications. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost – Social sciences and modernity, (3), 143-156 [In Russian].
14. Bridges, M. (2018). Extractive Practices in «Inclusive» States: Power and Poverty in the USA. London: London School of Economics.
15. Polterovich, V.M. (2018). To the general theory of socio-economic development. MPRA Paper, 88164. Retrieved from mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88164/1/MPRA_paper _88164.pdf [in Russian].
16. Kapeliushnikov, R.I. (2019). Contra Pan-institutionalism. Working paper WP3/2019/03. Moscow: HSE [in Russian].
17. Heyets, V., Hrytsenko, A., Blyzniuk, V. (Eds.). (2013). Institutions of employment and unemployment: Current Trends and Challenges for Ukraine. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for the Economy and Forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
18. Cherevichko, Т. (2014). Innovative aspects of institutionalization of the labor market. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Ser. Sociologiya. Politologiya –Bulletin of the National Saratov University. Sociology series. Political science, 2. Retrieved from cyberleninka.ru/article/n/innovatsionnye-aspekty-institutsionalizatsii-rynka-truda [in Russian].
19. Sadova, E. (2013). New trends in the socio-cultural sphere: the institutional aspect. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World economy and international relations, 11, 31 [in Russian].
20. African Development Bank (2012). Briefing Notes for AfDB's Long-Term Strategy – Briefing Note 6: Inclusive Growth Agenda. Retrieved from www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Policy-Documents/FINAL%20 Briefing%20Note%206%20Inclusive%20Growth.pdf
21. Tsapko-Piddubna, O.(2018) The principle of inclusiveness in modern concepts of economic growth. Problemy ekonomiky – Problems of the economy, 3, 29-36. Retrieved from nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pekon_2018_3_5 [in Ukrainian].
22. Global Wealth Databook 2018 (2018). Credit Suisse Group AG.
23. Van Gyes G. and Schulten T. (Eds.). (2015). Wage bargaining under the new European economic governance: Alternative strategies for inclusive growth. European Trade Union institute (ETUI). Brussels: ETUI.
24. Klunia, V. (2009). New trends in the socio-cultural sphere: the institutional aspect. World economy and international relations. Novolotsk [in Russian].
25. Zaychuk, O., Onishchenko, N. (2006). Theory of state and law. Academic course. Kyiv: Urincom Inter [in Ukrainian].
26. Borodina, O. (2015). Complementarity principle in scientific research: an interdisciplinary discourse. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economу and forecasting, 2, 47-58. doi.org/10.15407/eip2015.02.047 [in Ukrainian].
Events calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
