|
| HOME PAGE | |
№ 2021/3
LIHONENKO Larisa Oleksandrivna1, MYSYLIUK Vlada Serhiyivna 2
1SHEE "Kyiv Vadym Hetman National Economic University"
2Kyiv Vadym Hetman National Economic University
CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP: STATE, ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN, PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS
| Economy and forecasting 2021; 3:127-148 | https://doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2021.03.127 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article is devoted to the exploration of relevant issues of the development of corporate entrepreneurship organizational design in Ukrainian organizations. The implementation of corporate entrepreneurship organizational design provides acceleration of internal innovation process, increase of its effectiveness, identification and intensification of new opportunities for growth and creation of new businesses. The implementation of structures, definition of their functions, and description of the processes and formal relationships, which may encourage potential corporate entrepreneurs to generate and commercialize internal innovative initiatives, are becoming extremely relevant for Ukrainian business environment.
A research map and questionnaire were developed in order to conduct the empirical investigation of existing design practices for corporate entrepreneurship in Ukrainian organizations, and a survey was compiled through questionnaires with the use of Google forms. The results of the research revealed that Ukrainian organizations implement structures, processes, systems and norms, which stimulate corporate entrepreneurs, and initiate internal innovative projects.
At the same time, design practices for corporate entrepreneurship in Ukrainian organizations are characterized by a lack of integrity. This blocks quick development of innovations by internal venturing teams and their transformation into a value for business. Potential corporate entrepreneurs often leave the organization to start their own businesses because of the absence of internal organizational conditions for realizing their innovative ideas. The consequence of this situation is the emergence of a powerful ambitious competitor, thus, the strategic competitive position of the organization may suffer. The practical value of the research is to obtain empirical data about the state of implementation of the corporate entrepreneurship system in Ukrainian organizations and explore the parameters of its organizational design, such as: quality of internal organizational climate and human resources for the implementation of the corporate entrepreneurship process, development and implementation of corporate entrepreneurship programs, mechanisms for financing internal entrepreneurial initiatives of employees, legal support of corporate entrepreneurship, incentives and rewards for internal entrepreneurial behavior, and information distribution models and organizational forms of corporate entrepreneurship. The research results can serve as an information base for the formulation of recommendations for implementation of integral and effective organizational design aimed at retention and development of corporate entrepreneurs, and realization of their internal entrepreneurial initiatives in organizational context.
Keywords:corporate entrepreneurship, corporate entrepreneur, organizational design, innovation, entrepreneurial activity
JEL: JEL: O32, O33, M12, M13
| Article in English (pp. 127 - 148) | Download | Downloads :95 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Garrett, R.P., Covin, J.G. (2007). A model of corporate entrepreneurship as a strategic adaptation mechanism. In Entrepreneurial Strategic Processes. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7540(07)10002-7
3. Zahra, S.A., Neubaum, D.O., Hayton, J.C. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of research on corporate entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi.org/10.4337/9781785368738
4. Zhao, W., Liu, W., Chen, Y. (2019). Internal fission strategies in corporate entrepreneurship: a case study in China. Sustainability, 11(19), 5275. doi.org/10.3390/su11195275
5. Shin, B.Y., Cho, K.T. (2020). The evolutionary model of corporate entrepreneurship: a case study of Samsung Creative-Lab. Sustainability, 12(21), 9042. doi.org/10.3390/su12219042
6. Maine, E. (2008). Radical innovation through internal corporate venturing: Degussa\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s commercialization of nanomaterials. R&D Management, 38(4), 359-371. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00521.x
7. Dos Santos, R., Spann, M. (2011). Collective entrepreneurship at Qualcomm: combining collective and entrepreneurial practices to turn employee ideas into action. R&D Management, 41(5), 443-456. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00660.x
8. Zimmerman, J. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship at GE and Intel. Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS), 6(5). doi.org/10.19030/jbcs.v6i5.902
9. Burgelman, R.A. (1984). Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms. California management review, 26(3), 154-166. doi.org/10.2307/41165086
10. Burgelman, R.A. (1985). Managing the new venture division: Research findings and implications for strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 6(1), 39-54. doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060104
11. Chesbrough, H. (2000). Designing corporate ventures in the shadow of private venture capital. California Management Review, 42(3), 31-49. doi.org/10.2307/41166041
12. Hornsby, J.S., Kuratko, D.F., Holt, D.T., Wales, W.J. (2013). Assessing a measurement of organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 937-955. doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12038
13. Hornsby, J.S., Kuratko, D.F., Zahra, S.A. (2002). Middle managers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of business Venturing, 17(3), 253-273. doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00059-8
14. Chen, J., Zhu, Z., Anquan, W. (2005). A system model for corporate entrepreneurship. International Journal of Manpower, 26(6), 529-543. doi.org/10.1108/01437720510625449
15. Kelley, D. (2011). Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship: Evolving and connecting with the organization. Business Horizons, 54(1), 73-83. doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.003
16. Hartmann, P. (2014). New business creation: Systems for institutionalized radical innovation management. Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06047-3
17. Shirokova, G.V., Ezhova, Y.S. (2012). The Development of Corporate Entrepreneurship System in Russian Company: Creation, Evolution and Perspective. Russian Management Journal, 10(1), 117-140. Retrieved from rjm.spbu.ru/article/view/304 [in Russian].
18. Hisrich, R.D. (2016). Advanced introduction to corporate venturing. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Events calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
